- Consumer's Choice Award 2019
- Consumer's Choice Award 2020
- Consumer's Choice Award 2021
- Consumer's Choice Award 2022
- Consumer's Choice Award 2023
- Consumer's Choice Award 2024
If you were asked to perform a field sobriety test, you may feel stressed and unsure about how the results will affect your case. Our office in Western Springs helps clients understand how these tests are administered, what judges consider, and how mistakes during the test can impact outcomes. We focus on clear explanations, careful review of police procedures, and practical steps you can take after an arrest. A thoughtful approach often helps protect your rights and future.
We work with individuals charged with DUI who faced field sobriety tests. Our goal is to assess the administration, documentation, and context of the stop. We explain the potential limitations of field sobriety tests, such as weather, footwear, health, and lighting conditions. By understanding the process, clients can confront the evidence and plan a course of action with their attorney.
Challenging field sobriety test results can lead to a clearer picture of the underlying facts in your case. In Western Springs, we review how instructions were given, how tests were conducted, and whether any factors affected performance. When accuracy or procedure is questioned, details may change the admissibility of the evidence. By examining the test record and related documents, you can pursue strategies to protect your rights, minimize penalties, and improve potential outcomes.
Our firm brings together focused trial lawyers who regularly handle DUI cases in Illinois and the surrounding area. The team works with clients in Western Springs and nearby communities, combining strong research, careful client communication, and practical courtroom presentation. We emphasize clear explanations of complex legal rules, steady preparation, and collaborative strategy. While outcomes vary, the aim is to provide reliable guidance and responsive service throughout every stage of a case.
Understanding this service means recognizing how field sobriety tests fit into the broader DUI process. Police use these tests to assess impairment at the roadside, but the results are just one piece of the evidence. The defense focuses on how tests were administered, whether proper standards were followed, and how the stop and documentation were conducted. A thoughtful review can reveal opportunities to challenge or contextualize the findings in court.
Clients benefit from learning how various factors may influence performance, including weather, lighting, footwear, health conditions, and the officer’s instructions. By understanding the service, you can engage in a clearer discussion with your attorney, prepare questions for the prosecutor, and participate in strategy planning that aligns with your goals and needs.
A field sobriety test is a roadside assessment designed to measure balance, attention, and coordination. It is used by law enforcement to gauge whether further testing is warranted. The most common tests include balance and coordination tasks as well as eye movements. The results are considered one part of the overall case and may be subject to challenge if instructions were unclear, conditions were not ideal, or the test was misrecorded.
Key elements include proper instruction, accurate performance, faithful recording by the officer, and correct interpretation of the results. The process involves reviewing the stop notes, body camera or dash cam evidence if available, and the officer’s testimony about testing. Our aim is to identify gaps or inconsistencies that may affect the reliability of the test. A thorough analysis helps determine whether a challenge to the evidence is warranted and how it fits into the overall defense.
This glossary explains common terms encountered in discussions about field sobriety tests. It covers the purpose of testing, the way instructions are given, and how results are used in court. Understanding these terms helps you participate in discussions about your case and evaluate potential defense strategies. The definitions are written for readability and practical use in conversations with your attorney and the court.
A field sobriety test is a roadside assessment conducted to evaluate coordination and mental focus. It is not a direct measure of intoxication. The two common categories are instructional tests that require following specific directions and balance tests that assess stability. Factors such as weather, lighting, footwear, or health conditions can influence results. The test is one piece of evidence among many that may be presented at a hearing or trial.
Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus is a test observing eye movement as a person follows a moving object. The officer looks for jerking in the eyes, which can indicate impairment. The procedure requires proper administration, and misinstructions or environmental factors can affect accuracy. It is typically one element among several tests used to assess impairment. If the test was not conducted correctly, its impact on the case may be limited.
Walk-and-Turn is a balance and coordination test that requires taking a set number of steps heel-to-toe along a line and then turning around. It is designed to reveal issues with balance, attention, and following directions. The test’s reliability depends on clear instructions, proper surface, and absence of distractions. If administered improperly, the results may be challenged in court.
Administrative License Suspension describes the immediate loss of driving privileges under state law after certain DUI events. The process and timing can vary by jurisdiction. ALS is separate from the criminal case and may influence how evidence is handled. Understanding its impact helps you discuss timing and options with your attorney.
Several paths may be available after a field sobriety test result. Options include negotiating with prosecutors, seeking suppression of certain evidence, requesting additional testing, or pursuing a trial. The choice depends on the facts, the strength of the evidence, and your goals. A clear plan helps manage expectations and supports informed decision-making throughout the case.
Sometimes a focused defense on a single issue, such as the accuracy of a specific test or the stop procedure, is enough to move the outcome in a favorable direction. In these cases, a concise strategy can save time and focus resources on the most persuasive argument. A measured approach helps clients regain confidence and avoid unnecessary risk.
When a procedural error is evident, a limited approach may produce meaningful results without pursuing broader challenges. This might involve questioning how a test was administered or whether proper forms were completed. Addressing these details can lead to favorable outcomes with careful preparation and efficient use of court time.
One key benefit is a thorough understanding of the evidence, which helps in making strategic choices about how to respond to allegations. A broad review reduces surprises and gives you a stronger basis for evaluating options. Clients often appreciate how a coordinated approach clarifies the path forward and supports more confident decision-making.
Another advantage is consistency across steps in the process, from initial interview to courtroom presentation. A comprehensive plan helps align your expectations with achievable outcomes, fosters clear communication, and minimizes delays. The result is a more organized defense that addresses your situation with attention to detail.
With a broad review, potential issues and supporting facts surface, creating opportunities to challenge or contextualize the evidence. This approach helps ensure that the defense is not limited to a single test, but considers the broader circumstances surrounding the stop and the arrest.
A comprehensive plan coordinates investigation, witness preparation, and courtroom presentation. It helps keep the case organized, improves communication with you, and supports consistent messaging throughout negotiations or proceedings. A unified approach often leads to better alignment with your goals.
During roadside tests, remaining calm helps you listen to instructions and avoid unnecessary movements. Speak clearly and avoid arguing with the officer. If you feel unwell, note any symptoms in a respectful way. Do not volunteer information beyond what is requested. After the stop, write down details while they are fresh and share them with your attorney. Your composed approach supports a more accurate record for review.
Keep a private record of the sequence of events, including what you were told, the instructions you received, and how long you waited for a test. If you believe the testing process was improper, share these observations with your attorney. Gathering details now can support a measured defense later in the process.
Consider this service when you want a thorough review of how field sobriety tests were administered and documented. A comprehensive evaluation helps identify issues that could affect the case and informs decisions about next steps. Clear communication and careful preparation reduce uncertainty and support a more informed plan.
It can also be valuable to understand how test results relate to other evidence, such as chemical tests or eyewitness accounts. A well-coordinated approach helps ensure your story stays consistent across all parts of the case. Working with a team that prioritizes careful, timely preparation makes a real difference.
Common situations include situations where testing instructions were unclear, conditions were unfavorable for testing, or the stop procedure raised questions. In these cases, a closer review helps determine whether the evidence should be challenged or contextualized. When accuracy is in doubt, exploring alternatives and building a thoughtful defense is prudent.
Sometimes officers provide incomplete or confusing directions, or the testing environment does not meet standard guidelines. Inadequate setup can affect how a person performs, which may influence the results. A careful review of the instructions and environment helps determine whether the test should be questioned in court.
Weather conditions, uneven surfaces, poor lighting, and distractions can reduce reliability of field sobriety tests. When such factors are present, the results may not accurately reflect impairment. Noting these conditions helps your attorney assess the strength of the evidence and plan appropriate defenses.
Problems with how the test was administered, recorded, or interpreted can create questions about reliability. If the officer did not follow standardized procedures or failed to document results properly, these issues may be part of a successful defense.
Our team is dedicated to providing practical guidance and steady support through each step of your case. We listen, review facts, and explain options in plain language so you can make informed decisions. From initial consultation to courtroom preparation, you won’t face the process alone.
Choosing our firm means working with a team that prioritizes thoughtful preparation, clear communication, and a practical approach to field sobriety challenges. We tailor strategies to your needs, keep you informed, and coordinate steps to fit your schedule. The goal is to help you navigate the process with confidence.
Clients benefit from consistent updates, careful evidence review, and collaborative planning. We emphasize fairness and accuracy in testing, while pursuing options that align with your goals. Our focus is on delivering steady guidance and pursuing the best possible outcome.
With a practical, results-oriented approach, we help you understand the next steps, whether that means challenging a result in court or negotiating a favorable resolution. Our team remains accessible, responsive, and committed to your interests throughout the case.
Our process begins with listening to your story, collecting documents, and evaluating the strength of the field sobriety evidence. We plan a strategy, explain options, and outline the steps ahead. Throughout the case, you will receive updates and have opportunities to ask questions so you understand how decisions are made.
Initial Consultation and Case Review: We gather facts, review police reports, examine the testing procedures, and discuss goals. This step helps determine the best path forward and sets expectations for timing, potential motions, and next steps in the defense.
During the initial meeting we listen to your account, identify key dates, and outline available defenses. We explain how field sobriety tests fit into your case and discuss potential strategies. You leave with a clear plan for moving forward and a practical sense of what may happen next.
We organize and analyze all documents, including arrest reports and any testing records. This step builds the factual foundation for the defense and helps identify gaps or inconsistencies. You receive a summary of findings and proposed actions.
Investigation and Evidence Evaluation: We examine all available evidence, consult with experts if needed, and prepare issues for motions or negotiations. This stage focuses on building a robust understanding of the case.
Assessing the reliability and relevance of field sobriety documentation, video, and witness statements. We look for inconsistencies, missing details, or misinterpretations that could affect the outcome.
We develop a strategy that aligns with your goals, timeline, and the facts of the case. This plan guides motions, negotiations, and trial preparation.
Motion Practice and Negotiations: We file appropriate motions, engage with prosecutors, and prepare for hearings or a trial. The aim is to resolve the case on favorable terms when possible.
Requesting suppression, requesting additional testing, or challenging admissibility of specific evidence. We present legal arguments supported by the facts and documentation.
Preparing witnesses, organizing exhibits, and coordinating courtroom presentation. We strive for clear, persuasive advocacy focused on your goals.
At the Frankfort Law Group, we take great pride in our commitment to personal service. Clients come to us because they have problems, and they depend upon us to help them find solutions. We take these obligations seriously. When you meet with us, we know that you are only doing so because you need help. Since we started our firm in northeast Illinois, we have focused on providing each of our clients with personal attention. You do not have to be afraid to tell us your story. We are not here to judge you or make you feel ashamed for seeking help. Our only goal is to help you get results and move past your current legal problems.
At the Frankfort Law Group, we take great pride in our commitment to personal service. Clients come to us because they have problems, and they depend upon us to help them find solutions. We take these obligations seriously. When you meet with us, we know that you are only doing so because you need help. Since we started our firm in northeast Illinois, we have focused on providing each of our clients with personal attention. You do not have to be afraid to tell us your story. We are not here to judge you or make you feel ashamed for seeking help. Our only goal is to help you get results and move past your current legal problems.
During a roadside test an officer may administer several tasks designed to assess balance, attention, and coordination. You typically receive instructions, then perform the tasks as directed. It is important to listen carefully, avoid rushing, and follow the steps exactly. The results alone do not determine guilt, and there are many ways the test can be affected by factors beyond impairment. Your attorney can review whether the test was conducted properly and how the evidence fits with other findings. Test results are one part of the overall record. The defense may challenge the administration, the scoring, or the interpretation of the results. By examining the procedures, conditions, and documents, a lawyer helps present a balanced view of what happened and what it may mean for your case.
Yes, field sobriety results can be challenged in court. The defense may argue that the test was not administered according to standardized guidelines, that conditions compromised reliability, or that the stop circumstances unjustified the testing. Challenging results often involves motions, cross-examination, and presentation of alternative evidence. A careful defense seeks to place the test within the full context of the stop, the driver’s health, and the surrounding environment. It may also explore other tests or lab results to build a complete picture.
Many factors can affect test accuracy, including weather, lighting, footwear, medical conditions, fatigue, medications, and how instructions were given. Understanding these variables helps assess whether the results reliably indicate impairment. An attorney can document conditions, review officer notes, and determine whether the test should be challenged or contextualized in court.
ALS refers to the automatic suspension of driving privileges after certain DUI events. It is a separate process from the criminal case and has its own timelines. A lawyer can explain ALS implications, timing, and possible remedies or extensions. Understanding ALS helps coordinate decisions about testing, waiting periods, and when to seek relief from suspension while the case proceeds.
Whether to speak with the officer during or after a stop depends on the situation. Generally, it is best to remain respectful, provide minimal information, and avoid making statements that could be used against you. Consulting with a lawyer before responding to questions can help preserve your rights and ensure that any communication does not inadvertently deepen trouble. You can request to speak with your attorney and avoid answering targeted questions.
In many cases, police need reasonable suspicion or probable cause to require or administer tests. The rules vary by jurisdiction, but challenges to procedure can be a key part of defense. An attorney reviews the stop notes, testing protocol, and the police justification to determine if proper standards were followed. If not, it may affect the admissibility of the test and other parts of the case.
DUI cases can take weeks to months depending on complexity, court schedules, and the decision to pursue motions. Early planning and clear communication help manage timelines. Your attorney coordinates with prosecutors, prepares for hearings, and tracks deadlines. Staying informed helps you understand when to expect milestones and how to respond to new information during the process.
Field sobriety test results may be introduced at trial if properly admitted, subject to objections. The defense can challenge the relevance, accuracy, and foundation for the tests. Evidence handling and authentication are important, and your attorney can request suppression for improper procedures or lack of proper documentation. A thoughtful approach ensures the court weighs all evidence fairly.
For an initial consultation, gather any arrest reports, test records, medical information that could affect performance, and a list of questions you want to ask. Bring contact information for witnesses and any dates that matter. Having these items ready helps the attorney assess the case quickly and provide realistic guidance about possible outcomes. You will also have an opportunity to review potential strategies and discuss your goals.
Yes, a lawyer can assist with post conviction matters if such steps become appropriate after a case resolution. This may include filing post trial motions, appeals, or seeking relief from penalties depending on the circumstances. If you are considering further options, discuss timing, eligibility, and likely outcomes with your attorney. A focused plan helps you understand potential paths and stay informed about any changes in the law.