- Consumer's Choice Award 2019
- Consumer's Choice Award 2020
- Consumer's Choice Award 2021
- Consumer's Choice Award 2022
- Consumer's Choice Award 2023
- Consumer's Choice Award 2024
If you or a loved one were hurt in a bicycle collision in Illinois, you need clear information about your rights and the steps that follow. At Frankfort Law Group we represent people injured on bikes throughout Frankfort and the surrounding communities. This guide explains how liability is determined, what evidence matters, common types of injuries, and how insurance claims and civil lawsuits typically proceed. We also describe how a local law firm can help collect medical documentation, preserve crucial evidence, and communicate with insurers to protect your ability to pursue compensation for medical bills, lost earnings, and pain and suffering.
Bicycle collisions often involve complex fact patterns: motor vehicle drivers, road defects, and visibility issues all affect the outcome of a case. Understanding the timeline for reporting the crash, seeking medical care, and gathering witness statements can materially affect recovery options. This section highlights practical first steps to take at the scene and afterwards, including documenting damage, preserving clothing and equipment, and obtaining names of eyewitnesses. Knowing the process reduces uncertainty and helps injured riders make informed decisions about when to seek legal help and how to protect their potential claims while they focus on recovery.
After a bicycle accident, legal assistance helps injured riders navigate insurance adjusters, collect and preserve evidence, and evaluate the true value of their claim. Insurance companies often aim to limit payouts, and medical bills or ongoing care needs can be overlooked without careful documentation. A knowledgeable attorney can arrange medical evaluations, consult accident reconstruction specialists when needed, and advocate for full compensation that addresses both immediate expenses and long-term needs. Prompt action increases the likelihood of preserving evidence and witness memories, which supports stronger outcomes and reduces the stress of handling claim logistics while recovering.
Frankfort Law Group represents individuals in Frankfort and throughout Illinois, focusing on personal injury and trial advocacy for injured cyclists. Our team has handled a variety of serious bicycle collision cases involving cars, trucks, intersections, and hazardous road conditions. We prepare cases for trial when that is necessary to achieve a fair result and work to secure timely settlements when appropriate. Clients receive clear communication about case status, options for resolution, and anticipated timelines so they can concentrate on healing while we handle negotiations, depositions, and courtroom preparation as needed.
A bicycle accident claim typically seeks compensation for medical care, lost wages, pain and suffering, and property damage. Illinois follows comparative negligence rules, so responsibility may be apportioned between parties based on their roles in the collision. Timely medical treatment and documentation are essential because insurers and courts rely on contemporaneous records to link injuries to the crash. Gathering photos, police reports, witness statements, and repair estimates helps establish the facts. Knowing common pitfalls—like delayed treatment or giving recorded statements without counsel—can protect your rights and preserve recovery opportunities.
Every bicycle crash presents unique legal and factual questions: who had the right of way, visibility conditions, road signage, and whether vehicle operators were distracted or impaired. Investigation may include reviewing traffic camera footage, cellphone records, and maintenance histories for defective infrastructure. Because statutes of limitations and insurance policy limits can affect recovery, early consultation is often advisable. A methodical approach to evidence collection and claim presentation strengthens negotiations with insurers and prepares a case for trial if a fair settlement cannot be reached through discussion alone.
Several legal concepts commonly arise in bicycle crash matters, including negligence, duty of care, proximate cause, and damages. Negligence concerns whether a driver failed to act as a reasonably careful person would under the same circumstances. Proximate cause links that breach to the injuries suffered. Damages quantify the measurable losses, such as medical expenses and lost income, and non-economic harms like reduced quality of life. Comparative negligence rules may reduce recovery if a bicyclist is partially at fault. Understanding these terms helps injured individuals follow the claim process and evaluate settlement offers versus litigation.
An effective bicycle accident claim typically follows a sequence of steps: immediate medical care and documentation, scene investigation including photographs and witness contact information, formal evidence preservation through police reports and inspections, communication with insurers, and valuation of damages. Expert opinions or accident reconstruction may be retained in more complex cases. Settlement discussions are often attempted after a thorough review of liability and damages, with litigation reserved for disputes that cannot be resolved. Each phase requires attention to deadlines, documentation, and clear communication to protect the injured party’s legal position.
This glossary explains terms you may encounter when pursuing a bicycle accident claim. Clear definitions help you understand medical notes, insurance forms, and legal correspondence. Familiarity with these concepts reduces confusion and empowers you to make informed choices about settlement offers, depositions, and trial preparation. Below are concise definitions for frequently referenced terms that commonly arise during investigation, insurance negotiations, and litigation in Illinois personal injury matters involving bicyclists.
Negligence refers to the failure to act with reasonable care under the circumstances, which results in harm to another person. In bicycle accident cases, negligence might involve a driver who ran a red light, failed to yield the right of way, or did not check blind spots before turning. Proving negligence requires showing that the defendant owed a duty of care to the injured party, breached that duty, and that the breach caused the injuries and damages claimed. Evidence such as eyewitness testimony, traffic camera footage, and police reports supports these elements in a claim.
Comparative fault is the doctrine used in Illinois to allocate responsibility when more than one party contributed to an accident. If a bicyclist is partly responsible for a collision—due to improper signaling or riding outside a bike lane—court or jury may reduce the total award proportionately. For example, a finding that the bicyclist was 25 percent at fault would reduce recovery by that amount. Understanding how comparative fault is assessed can guide decisions about settlement and litigation strategy, and highlights why careful documentation and persuasive evidence are important.
Damages refer to the monetary compensation sought for losses resulting from the accident. They typically include economic damages, such as current and future medical expenses, lost wages, and property repair costs, and non-economic damages, such as pain, suffering, and loss of enjoyment of life. Calculating damages often requires review of medical records, wage statements, and expert assessments of future care needs. Accurate valuation is important for negotiating with insurers and for presenting a persuasive case if the matter proceeds to trial.
Evidence preservation involves taking steps to protect physical and digital information relevant to the crash, including damaged equipment, clothing, photos of injuries and the scene, police reports, and electronic data such as dashcam or cellphone footage. Prompt preservation helps prevent loss or alteration of crucial proof that supports liability and damages. Failing to preserve evidence can weaken a claim and give insurers grounds to dispute causation or severity. Knowing how and where to secure evidence early improves the ability to build a credible case.
After a bicycle collision, injured parties can pursue limited assistance from an attorney, such as document review or a single negotiation, or engage full representation for a comprehensive litigation strategy. Limited help may suffice for uncomplicated claims with clear liability and minor injuries, while full representation addresses complex liability questions, significant medical needs, or disputes that require deposition and trial preparation. Choosing between these paths depends on injury severity, insurance coverage limits, and the likelihood that negotiations will require formal discovery and courtroom advocacy to reach a just outcome.
A limited approach can be appropriate when liability is straightforward and injuries are minor, requiring only short-term medical care with easily calculable expenses. If a police report clearly assigns fault to the other driver and the insurer quickly offers a reasonable amount to cover bills and minor wage loss, a brief attorney consultation to review the offer is often adequate. This path helps avoid prolonged legal engagement and keeps costs down while ensuring any settlement adequately addresses documented losses and does not waive future claims.
When injuries require minimal ongoing treatment and economic losses are limited, a limited scope arrangement may be sensible. In such cases, the injured person may prefer to handle routine communications with the insurer personally while obtaining legal guidance only for crucial steps, like reviewing a final release. This approach works best when there is low risk of latent complications emerging, insured limits are adequate to cover current losses, and there is no substantial dispute over the facts of the collision that would necessitate formal discovery or expert testimony.
Full representation is generally advisable when injuries are serious, recovery is ongoing, or liability is contested. Cases involving hospitalization, surgeries, or permanent impairment require careful documentation of medical needs and long-term costs. When the at-fault party disputes responsibility or offers only a minimal payment, comprehensive legal work—including investigation, retention of medical and accident reconstruction professionals, and readiness for trial—strengthens the injured person’s position. A thorough process ensures all damages and future care needs are considered during negotiations or courtroom presentation.
Complex cases involving multiple responsible parties, uninsured or underinsured motorists, or disputes about insurance policy limits commonly require a full-service approach. Identifying all potential sources of compensation—such as commercial vehicle carriers, municipal entities responsible for road maintenance, or secondary insurers—requires detailed legal and factual investigation. Addressing challenging coverage questions and coordinating claims across carriers is time-consuming and benefits from sustained attorney involvement to preserve rights, obtain necessary documentation, and pursue every avenue for fair compensation.
A comprehensive approach increases the chance that all present and future losses are accounted for in any settlement or judgment. By thoroughly documenting medical treatment, consulting specialists when appropriate, and preparing for deposition and trial, an injured person reduces the risk of accepting a low offer that fails to cover long-term needs. Comprehensive representation also manages communications with multiple insurers and coordinates liens or subrogation claims, allowing the injured person to focus on recovery while legal counsel handles technical negotiations and procedural requirements.
Full representation ensures a consistent strategy across investigation, negotiation, and litigation phases, which can preserve leverage and credibility with insurers and opposing counsel. When cases proceed through discovery, the ability to present well-organized evidence and persuasive witness testimony often results in improved outcomes. Additionally, sustained legal advocacy can deter lowball settlement tactics and provide clarity about realistic case value, so clients understand what to expect and can make informed choices about settlement timing or proceeding to trial if necessary.
Comprehensive representation prioritizes gathering all documentation necessary to prove damages, including detailed medical records, bills, and expert reports on future care costs. This attention to documentation strengthens the factual record supporting claims for lost income, rehabilitation expenses, and non-economic harms. By ensuring contemporaneous records and credible expert testimony are available, the case stands on a firmer footing during negotiations or in court. This diligence also helps avoid surprises that could reduce recovery after accepting an insufficient settlement.
A comprehensive approach readies a case for effective negotiation while maintaining the credibility needed for litigation if necessary. Preparing for trial shapes settlement strategy by clarifying the strengths and weaknesses of the case and identifying the evidence and testimony needed to prevail. The opposing side is often more willing to make fair offers when they know a case is trial-ready. Strategic preparation also helps manage the timing of settlement discussions, ensuring offers are evaluated against a clear understanding of potential courtroom outcomes.
Take photos of vehicle damage, your bicycle, visible injuries, and the surrounding road conditions as soon as it is safe to do so. Capture weather, traffic signals, skid marks, and any obstructions or potholes that may have contributed to the crash. Collect names and contact information for witnesses, and note their statements while memories are fresh. If a police report is generated, obtain the report number and officer’s name. These immediate actions preserve critical evidence that supports a claim and helps reconstruct the events leading to the collision.
Be cautious about providing recorded statements to insurance adjusters without first consulting legal counsel. Adjusters may use statements to challenge the severity of injuries or the sequence of events. Instead, provide necessary administrative information and focus on preserving medical documentation, witness information, and photographs. If liability or damages are disputed, seek legal advice before signing releases or finalizing settlements to ensure terms fully address current and future needs. Protecting your rights early improves the prospects of a fair resolution.
Consider legal assistance when insurance companies are reluctant to pay fair compensation, when injuries lead to substantial medical bills or lost income, or when liability is contested. An attorney can assist with gathering medical records, consulting professionals about future care needs, and negotiating with insurers to address both short- and long-term losses. Legal help is particularly important when claims involve significant scarring, chronic pain, or conditions that impair the ability to work. Skilled representation helps ensure offers reflect the full extent of the harm suffered.
Legal counsel is also helpful when multiple parties might share responsibility, when municipal entities are involved due to road defects, or when insurance limits are unclear. Lawyers can identify all potential sources of recovery and advise on timing for claims to avoid missing critical deadlines. They can also coordinate with medical providers and lien holders, helping clients focus on recovery rather than administrative burdens. Ultimately, legal assistance provides structure and advocacy during a period when injured individuals often face physical, financial, and emotional strain.
Common scenarios that result in legal claims include collisions with motor vehicles at intersections, right-hook or left-crossing crashes, vehicles failing to yield, dooring incidents in parking areas, and hazardous road conditions like potholes or debris. Additional circumstances arise where commercial vehicles are involved, where drivers are distracted by phones, or where inadequate signage and poor lighting contribute to dangerous conditions. Each circumstance requires specific investigative steps to identify responsible parties and pursue appropriate compensation for injuries and losses.
Intersection collisions often produce complex liability questions because multiple parties may have competing accounts of the traffic sequence. Video evidence, traffic signal data, and witness statements become especially important in these cases. Intersection crashes can cause serious injuries due to combined vehicle speeds and abrupt impacts. Timely preservation of any available footage and a careful review of traffic citations and police reports help determine fault and build a persuasive claim for damages associated with medical care and recovery time.
Dooring occurs when a motorist opens a vehicle door into the path of a cyclist, often causing sudden collisions with significant shoulder or limb injuries. Parking lot incidents involve limited visibility and unpredictable pedestrian and vehicle movement, raising liability and notice issues for property owners and drivers. These cases rely on witness accounts, surveillance footage, and assessments of visibility and signage. Documentation from the scene and prompt medical records are essential to establish causation and quantify damages related to immediate and ongoing care.
Damaging road conditions—such as potholes, uneven pavement, missing signage, or debris—can cause bicycle crashes and bring claims against municipal entities or contractors responsible for maintenance. These cases require investigation into maintenance records, prior complaints, and the timing of repairs. Notice requirements and immunity issues can complicate recovery, so identifying records of complaints or prior incidents is important. When road conditions significantly contributed to the crash, additional discovery and documentation may be needed to pursue compensation from public or private entities involved in upkeep.
Frankfort Law Group assists injured bicyclists through every stage of a claim, from initial evidence preservation to settlement or trial if necessary. We prioritize clear communication, prompt investigation, and coordinated medical referrals when needed. Our team helps clients understand realistic timelines and possible outcomes, negotiates with insurers, and prepares cases for litigation when that is required. If you have questions about preservation of evidence, statute of limitations, or potential sources of recovery, contacting a local firm early can protect your rights and preserve important legal options.
Frankfort Law Group is committed to helping injured clients navigate the legal process with personalized attention and clear guidance. We handle investigation, insurer communications, and case valuation so clients can concentrate on medical recovery. Our attorneys have trial experience and prepare every case thoroughly, which often strengthens negotiating positions during settlement talks. We keep clients informed at each step and discuss realistic expectations, potential outcomes, and the sensitivities involved in claims that affect long-term wellbeing and finances.
Our approach emphasizes prompt action to preserve evidence, thorough documentation of medical needs, and strategic negotiation to seek full and fair compensation. We understand local courts, insurance practices, and the standards that judges and juries apply in bicycle collision disputes. When necessary, we coordinate with medical and vocational professionals to accurately reflect ongoing care needs and lost earning capacity. Clients receive clear explanations of options so they can make confident decisions about settlement timing or pursuing trial.
Choosing legal representation means having a dedicated advocate for communicating with insurers, third parties, and healthcare providers. We address issues such as medical liens and coordination of benefits to protect settlement proceeds for clients. By handling procedural requirements and advocating forcefully on behalf of injured riders, we aim to reduce the administrative burden on clients and pursue outcomes designed to help cover current and future losses related to the collision.
Our process begins with a thorough intake, injury assessment, and collection of available evidence such as photos, police reports, and medical records. We then conduct an investigation to identify all responsible parties and insurance coverage. After estimating damages, we engage in negotiations with insurers and attempt settlement when it fairly compensates the client. If necessary, we proceed with litigation, including discovery, depositions, and trial preparation. Throughout, we keep clients informed about options, potential timelines, and the strengths of their claim.
In the initial phase we gather medical records, accident reports, witness statements, and any available video or photographic evidence. This early compilation forms the basis for assessing liability and damages, and it informs decisions about whether to engage additional professionals for reconstruction or medical analysis. We prioritize securing time-sensitive evidence and advising clients on how to preserve crucial items, such as damaged equipment and clothing. This phase sets the foundation for accurate valuation of the claim and effective negotiation.
We review all medical documentation to understand the scope of injuries and to coordinate follow-up care when needed. This includes emergency room notes, imaging reports, specialist visits, and therapy records. By documenting treatment timelines and expected future care, we can present a comprehensive view of medical needs to insurers. Proper medical documentation also supports claims for lost income and non-economic damages, and helps ensure that ongoing or future treatments are accounted for when evaluating settlement offers.
Our team conducts a detailed scene investigation, including collecting photographs, police reports, and witness contact information. We follow up with witnesses to capture statements while memories remain fresh and seek out any surveillance or traffic camera footage. When road defects or maintenance issues are factors, we obtain relevant municipal records and prior complaints. This investigative work supports a clearer reconstruction of events and strengthens the presentation of liability to insurers or the court.
After compiling evidence and assessing damages, we prepare a formal demand package to submit to the at-fault party’s insurer. The demand presents a clear narrative of liability, documentation of injuries and costs, and a reasoned valuation of the claim. We handle communications with adjusters and respond to inquiries or low offers with factual rebuttals supported by the assembled evidence. Negotiation aims to achieve fair compensation without delay, but we maintain readiness to pursue litigation if offers fail to reflect the claim’s true value.
Valuation involves compiling medical bills, wage loss documentation, and projections for future care when needed. We prepare a comprehensive demand package that includes medical summaries, photographs, and a clear explanation of how injuries affect daily life and income. The demand outlines a monetary figure supported by evidence and legal reasoning so insurers can evaluate liability and damages accurately. A well-prepared demand increases the likelihood of fair settlement while preserving leverage for litigation if necessary.
During negotiation we evaluate insurer offers against documented damages and advise clients about the strengths and weaknesses of settlement options. When an offer falls short, we respond with substantiated counterarguments and additional documentation. If a settlement is likely, we explain release terms and coordinate resolution to ensure medical liens and outstanding obligations are addressed. If negotiations stagnate, we consider escalation through formal discovery, depositions, or filing suit to pursue a fuller recovery.
If settlement negotiations do not produce a fair outcome, we prepare the case for litigation. This includes drafting and filing pleadings, conducting discovery, taking and defending depositions, and retaining experts such as medical providers or accident reconstruction professionals. Thorough trial preparation focuses on organizing evidence, preparing witnesses, and developing persuasive themes for jury or bench presentation. While many claims resolve before trial, readiness to litigate strengthens negotiating leverage and helps secure fair compensation when insurers resist reasonable offers.
In the discovery phase we request and exchange documents, take depositions, and pursue information that clarifies liability and damages. Expert consultation may be necessary to explain medical prognoses or reconstruct accident dynamics. These professionals assist in linking injuries to the collision and estimating future care needs or wage loss. Discovery helps narrow disputed issues, and expert opinions provide persuasive, technical support that can influence settlement negotiations or trial outcomes. Careful preparation at this stage is essential for a credible presentation in court.
Trial advocacy involves presenting evidence, examining witnesses, and arguing legal theories before a judge or jury. We develop a clear case narrative, prepare lay and expert witnesses, and anticipate defenses the other side may raise. The goal is to demonstrate liability and the full extent of damages in a convincing manner. Even when cases resolve before the courtroom, the rigors of trial preparation improve settlement positions and ensure that agreements reached before trial adequately reflect the true value of the client’s losses.
At the Frankfort Law Group, we take great pride in our commitment to personal service. Clients come to us because they have problems, and they depend upon us to help them find solutions. We take these obligations seriously. When you meet with us, we know that you are only doing so because you need help. Since we started our firm in northeast Illinois, we have focused on providing each of our clients with personal attention. You do not have to be afraid to tell us your story. We are not here to judge you or make you feel ashamed for seeking help. Our only goal is to help you get results and move past your current legal problems.
At the Frankfort Law Group, we take great pride in our commitment to personal service. Clients come to us because they have problems, and they depend upon us to help them find solutions. We take these obligations seriously. When you meet with us, we know that you are only doing so because you need help. Since we started our firm in northeast Illinois, we have focused on providing each of our clients with personal attention. You do not have to be afraid to tell us your story. We are not here to judge you or make you feel ashamed for seeking help. Our only goal is to help you get results and move past your current legal problems.
Immediately after a bicycle collision, ensure your safety and seek medical attention for any injuries. If possible, document the scene with photos of damage, injuries, road conditions, and any relevant traffic signs. Collect contact information from drivers, passengers, and eyewitnesses, and note the responding officer and police report number. Preserving this evidence early supports later claims and can be critical if liability is disputed.Report the accident to your insurer and consider consulting a local law firm before giving recorded statements to the at-fault party’s insurance company. Early legal guidance helps protect your rights, ensures evidence is preserved properly, and clarifies next steps for medical documentation and communication with insurers while you focus on recovery.
Illinois uses a comparative fault system to allocate responsibility when multiple parties share blame for an accident. Under comparative fault, a recovery can be reduced by the injured party’s percentage of responsibility, so fault allocation matters in determining final compensation. Evidence such as witness statements, police reports, and scene photos all inform how fault is apportioned.Because fault may be disputed, prompt investigation is important. Gathering contemporaneous evidence and medical records strengthens the position of any injured bicyclist and helps to counter arguments that the injuries were caused by something other than the crash. Legal assistance can help present these materials effectively to insurers or a court.
Yes, you can still recover damages if you were partially at fault, though your recovery will be reduced by your percentage of fault under Illinois law. For instance, if a settlement is valued at a certain amount and you are found 20 percent at fault, your recovery is reduced accordingly. This makes accurate evidence and persuasive argumentation important to minimize any share of fault attributed to the bicyclist.To address comparative fault, gather evidence that supports your version of events: photos, witness statements, and traffic camera footage if available. Demonstrating the other party’s negligence through documentation can reduce the percentage of fault assigned to you and increase your net recovery.
The statute of limitations for personal injury actions in Illinois generally requires filing a lawsuit within two years of the date of the injury. Missing this deadline can bar a legal claim, so timeliness is essential. There are limited exceptions that may extend deadlines in special circumstances, but relying on exceptions is risky without legal advice.Early consultation with a local attorney helps ensure deadlines are met and necessary steps, such as preserving evidence and notifying potential defendants, are completed. Acting promptly also supports better evidence collection and witness cooperation, which benefits the overall claim.
Compensation in bicycle accident claims can include economic damages like medical expenses, rehabilitation costs, prescription and therapy bills, property damage to your bicycle and gear, and lost wages for time missed from work. When injuries affect earning capacity, claims may also include future lost income and vocational rehabilitation costs.Non-economic damages address pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life. In some cases with particularly severe harm, punitive damages may be available where conduct was especially reckless. Accurate documentation and expert assessments help quantify both present and future losses for settlement or trial.
You should be cautious about speaking at length with the other driver’s insurance company right after an accident. Adjusters sometimes request recorded statements that can be used to minimize claims. Provide essential facts but avoid detailed recorded statements about injuries or fault until you understand your medical condition and potential legal exposure.Consider consulting legal counsel before making substantive statements or signing releases. An attorney can advise on what information to provide, handle insurer communications, and protect your interests throughout negotiation so you do not inadvertently weaken your claim.
Medical records form the backbone of a bicycle accident claim, documenting injuries, treatment plans, diagnostic tests, and ongoing care. Insurers and courts rely on these records to connect injuries to the accident and to verify the necessity and costs of treatment. Keeping organized copies of visits, prescriptions, therapy notes, and medical bills helps establish the extent of damages.Prompt and consistent treatment also supports credibility, as gaps in care can be used to argue injuries are unrelated or not severe. If needed, medical professionals can provide assessments of future treatment needs and long-term effects, which are important for calculating comprehensive compensation.
Municipal road defects can be actionable if negligent maintenance or failure to warn caused the crash, but claims against government entities often involve special notice requirements and procedural rules. Establishing liability typically requires investigation of maintenance records, prior complaints, and the timing of repairs. These cases can be more complex and may need additional discovery into governmental practices.Because public-entity claims have unique deadlines and notice procedures, consulting with counsel early ensures compliance with legal requirements and helps preserve potential recovery. Properly documenting the defect and any related incidents strengthens the claim against public or private parties responsible for road upkeep.
Evaluating future medical needs involves reviewing current treatment progress, diagnostic findings, and prognosis from medical providers. Experts such as treating physicians or life-care planners may estimate future care, assistive devices, therapy needs, and attendant care costs. These assessments help quantify long-term medical expenses and provide a foundation for seeking compensation that addresses future financial burdens.Because future care valuations require professional judgment, presenting credible expert analysis strengthens negotiations and trial presentations. Accurate projections ensure settlements cover anticipated needs and reduce the risk of uncovered expenses later in a client’s recovery.
Not all bicycle accident claims go to court; many are resolved through negotiation with insurers. However, when liability is disputed or offers do not adequately compensate for injuries and future needs, filing a lawsuit and pursuing litigation may be necessary to achieve a fair result. Preparing for trial signals to insurers that the case will be vigorously pursued if a reasonable settlement is not reached.Clients should be prepared for timelines associated with discovery, depositions, and potential trial, but also know that thorough preparation often increases settlement offers. Discussing realistic expectations with counsel helps determine whether negotiation or litigation is the most appropriate path for the specific facts of a case.